Top Selling Products!  CLICK HERE!
Home Tell A Friend Contact
    
6 Megapixels & Up Digital Cameras
Home Theater
DVD Home Theater
Mini Home Theater
Home Theater Speaker Systems
Television
Flat-Panel TVs
HDTV & Accessories
LCD TVs
Plasma TVs
DVD Players
All DVD Players
DVD Recorders
VCR-DVD & Other DVD Combos
Multidisc DVD Players
Progressive-Scan DVD Players
Single-Disc DVD Players
Portable
Boomboxes
Cassette Players & Recorders
Digital Voice Recorders
Portable CD Players
Portable DVD Players
Portable TVs
Audio
MP3 Player
Amplifiers & Preamplifiers
Receivers
Executive Desktop Compact Stereo Systems
Camera & Photo
Digital Cameras [2 to 2.9 Megapixels]
Digital Cameras [3 to 3.9 Megapixels]
Digital Cameras [4 to 4.9 Megapixels]
Digital Cameras [5 to 5.9 Megapixels]
Digital Cameras [6 & Up Megapixels]
Camcorders [8mm-Hi8]
Camcorders [Digital DVD]
Camcorders [Digital MicroDV]
Camcorders [Digital MiniDV]
Camcorders [Digital8]
GPS & Navigation
Cables for GPS System
Cases for GPS System
Vehicle Mounts
Digital Compasses
Handheld GPS Units
GPS for PDAs
GPS Mapping Software
Vehicle GPS Units
 
*Prices may change   
 Customer Reviews:

Canon EOS 30D 8.2MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)
Canon EOS 30D 8.2MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) Buy From Amazon.com
Average Customer Rating: 5.0/5      Total Reviews: 40

Rating: 5
Glad I bought it
Camera:

Rating: 5
Very good camera overall
I had no investment in a DSLR but narrowed my choices to the Canon 30D and the Nikon D200. I had always wanted a Nikon. The D200 is definitely a joy to hold and it did take good pictures (I tried both at a camera store before I bought the 30D). I did a lot of research (more than I care to admit!) and there was no conclusive evidence that one camera had a clear edge over the other. Depending on your specific needs, one camera may be "slightly better" than the other.

Rating: 3
Good product with some limitations
I bought a 30D along with the 580ex flash. I have always bought Canon products (point-and-shoot, SLR film). I used this product for a couple of weeks and thought it did have some limitations. The biggest drawback was underexposed flash images in full auto mode. The most frustrating part was that they look great on the screen during review but, when you look at them on the computer, they are very underexposed. I know that this would not be a issue if I captured the images in RAW format. I however want to primarily shoot family pictures in JPEG and not edit every picture. I searched the web and saw that numerous people had the same problem and they changed to the program mode with a +3/4 to +1 exposure compensation. Outdoors, the full auto mode seemed to meter fine. I understand that most users of this type of camera would not have an issue with and enjoy customizing each setting but, I want my wife to be able to be able to pick the camera up and take a decently exposed flash picture of our two year old using full auto mode. I even exchanged the camera for another one and had the same issue. I used a Canon 24-105, Canon 17-85 IS and a Tamron 17-50/2.8 lens and had the same issue. I made a very tough decision to move over to the Nikon D200 with SB-800 flash. It takes very clear and accurate exposed pictures in full auto mode with the flash. The build quality is also a lot better. It does cost more though but, I think it's worth it. Bottom line though is that this camera takes great pictures outdoor and indoor with flash using exposure compensation. If you take mostly indoor family pictures like I do, the full auto mode is useless and you'll need to make corrections to the settings or with editing software.

   [ Back ]

 
 
 

Electronics & Cameras